Evolved consciousness is not all about the truth, it’s about relationship and connectivity one with another.
There is a gaping weakness in the Truth Movement. So much of what is asserted as fact is based on interpretational data. Isolated observations become evidence, personal prejudices become intuitive guidance, conjecture become fact and beliefs become foundations. These are the broken tools by which we create truth and we hold that truth up as the ultimate pinnacle by which all behaviour is justified as good or bad. Yet the very premise of truth is based on inaccuracies and a tenuous duality that is infected with ego and the frailty of the divided human consciousness.
If there was really only one truth, and we were fully conscious, there would be no difference of opinion. Evidently there is something drastically wrong in our assertion that truth is the ultimate criteria for action, as the truth is rarely corroborated in complex issues. Either that, or due to our fallen state we are not capable of using truth as an accurate criteria for actions.
Quantum physics has demonstrated this conundrum correctly, by proving that a person’s energetic interaction in an experiment can influence the outcome. Meaning your predisposition of what the truth ‘should’ be can influence the empirical data that you base evidence upon. If that is the case, then truth is not a constant, but a variable and no longer a reliable criteria.
This is not a pointless philosophical argument. Reason being, this is exactly the weakness that the overlords are constantly exploiting in us to cause division and keep us chasing our tails like rats in a maze. To anchor my point, the Charles material has clearly exploited this weakness in interpretational truth and we see the evidence of it right here in this division.
If we continue to use interpretational data to define our personal versions of the truth, we will continue to be a divided species, both on a conscious level and socially. History concurs that these assertions of interpretational data have been misused in the name of truth for Melania and it has constantly failed us. There must be a better way forward.
We know that the jump gate of evolution lies in heart or unity consciousness. I suggest that as ambassadors of the ‘Truth Movement’ we need to be ahead of the game and enter a point of evolution where we recognise and deal with the problems of interpretational truth, or evolve to a higher heart consciousness. Both these options require a shift in paradigms that may seem totally unreachable when we are entrenched in polarity.
To quote Einstein ‘if we keep doing what we always have done, we will keep getting the same results’ Grasping these issues is crucial to our transition towards unity consciousness and I maintain that is the only point where the overlords will lose their grasp of control.
I know these are dangerous concepts to explore and I may be reaching far too high into idealism in what I have written. But are we not the people that aspire to that highest ideal and if so, is it not worth the risk to lay interpretational truths aside, with all its inherent divisiveness for the sake of discovering unity and evolution?
No comments yet. Be the first!